Some good might come of the bond, but I'm willing to wait until policy makers have it right, or at least better, before I say yes. Here's the reasons that resonate with me to say no, based on my reading:
Using general obligation funds rather than ratepayer funds to pay for water supply is inherently a subsidy and often sends the wrong cost signal to consumers. Paying the full cost of water supply through one's utility bill provides a better incentive for conservation and efficient use. There are exceptions to this statement, and the one I would have liked to see addressed is the the Delta Conveyance, but that is explicitly prohibited from being funded by the terms of the bond (probably because it is so controversial in N Ca. Voters at some remove can see that the way the state currently gets water from the Delta ought to be fixed, somehow.)
No one knows how the California Water Commission would evaluate proposals to spend the 2.7 billion dollars allocated for the "public benefits" of new storage (surface or groundwater). While there is significant political pressure to allocate the funds for certain proposed (and controversial) surface storage projects, including Sites and Temperance Flat reservoirs, many believe those projects cannot pass any reasonable economic hurdles.
Requirements of the bond can be read to favor improvement of or new surface water storage facilities rather than ground water storage, desalination, or waste water reuse. This is an area in which the bond is not very clear and we will only learn the criteria against which proposed facilities are ranked after the bond is approved, if ever.
The bond doesn't do enough for conservation of water, arguably the most effective approach to the current drought.
The bond doesn't address our current drought in any other meaningful way.
2014-10-29
2014-10-10
New bent and twisted series
2014-10-09
Urinate in the shower to save a wee bit of water
This is not my personal recommendation; the BBC is reporting this water saving approach.
They want the university's 15,000 students to take their first wee of the day while having their morning shower.
Mr Dobson, 20, said the idea could "save enough water to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool 26 times".
The pair want those taking part to pledge their allegiance on Facebook and Twitter and have offered gift vouchers to the first people to join the challenge.
University students are being urged to urinate in the shower in a bid to save water.
The Go with the Flow campaign is the brainchild of students
Debs Torr and Chris Dobson, from the University of East Anglia (UEA) in
Norwich.They want the university's 15,000 students to take their first wee of the day while having their morning shower.
Mr Dobson, 20, said the idea could "save enough water to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool 26 times".
The pair want those taking part to pledge their allegiance on Facebook and Twitter and have offered gift vouchers to the first people to join the challenge.
2014-10-05
2014-10-04
Hedge Nettle (Stachys ajudgoides)
I picked up Hedge Nettle (Stachys ajugoides) at the monthly White Point Nature Preserve native plant sale. I've been twice and it seems the sale is usually quite small - perhaps they are selections left over from plants grown for restoration. People tend to hover and swoop in for the few that they want. Still, there's some interesting possibilities even after the swooping is done.
I got it in the ground right away on the small north-facing slope next to my driveway. My hope is that it will fill in between the Iris 'Canyon Snow' with which I am gradually replacing the agapanthus.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
I got it in the ground right away on the small north-facing slope next to my driveway. My hope is that it will fill in between the Iris 'Canyon Snow' with which I am gradually replacing the agapanthus.
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)